2 Comments

Merrill

An industry expert like Grabowski would say the problem goes deeper than transparency and staffing. A small percentage of firms are PE controlled, 60% of long-term care patients are Medicaid--and not changing, Medicare Advantage is ratcheting down payments and prioritizing home health, and SNF work is at the bottom of the totem pole as far as institutional employment goes. Its drudgery. Even if a few percentage points of revenue got redirected into SNF operations, there still would be a shortfall. It's not that SNFs don't need more staffing--they do. But if you implemented a staffing mandate, even over three years, the foundation of nursing home care is so broke we would find the false prophecy of chaos is not so false. A mandate without other big-time changes would likely lead to more harm than benefit, and CMS would have to proffer new regs in short order.

Brad

Expand full comment
author

As I noted in the piece, the underfunding by Medicaid is the issue that Congress (and Americans generally) needs to address. We’re going to have nursing homes, even with a large expansion of at-home care, which will also require new funds to attract well trained and adequate staffing to the field. I am hoping mandates will drive the necessary reckoning. The total failure of the US to have a system for adequate long-term care needs to be addressed.

Expand full comment